Cloudbeds vs Razorpay

Cloudbeds and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #31) holds a meaningful lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 30). The gap of 33 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,815 stars across 177 public repos, 68 active in the last 90 days and 37 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Razorpay's footprint is roughly 77.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.