Cloudbeds vs Wistia

Cloudbeds and Wistia (One place for all your team’s video-ing) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Wistia (rank #276) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 30). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wistia is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wistia is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Wistia. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wistia is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wistia is ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Wistia shows 680 stars across 174 public repos, 24 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Wistia's footprint is roughly 13.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wistia looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.