The easiest way to learn to code.
Codecademy vs HubSpot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Codecademy (The easiest way to learn to code.) and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Codecademy (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 37). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is ahead of Codecademy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), HubSpot is ahead of Codecademy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Codecademy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Codecademy.
Codecademy carries 5,241 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 10.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Codecademy is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Codecademy | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #93 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 56 |
| Code | 41 | 55 |
| Education | 42 | 52 |
| Community | 35 | 35 |
| Reach | 43 | 95 |
| Momentum | 14 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,241 | 53,481 |
| Forks | 23,171 | 6,864 |
| Public repos | 86 | 381 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 35 |
| External contributors | 5 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 24 | 37 |