The easiest way to learn to code.
Codecademy vs Instructure, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Codecademy (The easiest way to learn to code.) and Instructure, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Instructure, Inc. (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Codecademy (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 37). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Instructure, Inc. is ahead of Codecademy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Instructure, Inc. is slightly ahead of Codecademy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Instructure, Inc. is ahead of Codecademy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Codecademy is ahead of Instructure, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Instructure, Inc. is clearly ahead of Codecademy.
Codecademy carries 5,241 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Instructure, Inc. shows 10,186 stars across 212 public repos, 37 active in the last 90 days and 29 external contributors.
Codecademy is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Instructure, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Codecademy | Instructure, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 44 |
| Code | 41 | 56 |
| Education | 42 | 50 |
| Community | 35 | 45 |
| Reach | 43 | 24 |
| Momentum | 14 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,241 | 10,186 |
| Forks | 23,171 | 4,189 |
| Public repos | 86 | 212 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 37 |
| External contributors | 5 | 29 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 24 | 41 |