The easiest way to learn to code.
Codecademy vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Codecademy (The easiest way to learn to code.) and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Codecademy (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 37). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Codecademy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Codecademy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is ahead of Codecademy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Codecademy is clearly ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Codecademy.
Codecademy carries 5,241 GitHub stars across 86 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors.
Codecademy is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Codecademy | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 53 |
| Code | 41 | 66 |
| Education | 42 | 85 |
| Community | 35 | 47 |
| Reach | 43 | 8 |
| Momentum | 14 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,241 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 23,171 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 86 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 23 |
| External contributors | 5 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 46 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 24 | 34 |