Qodo vs Cursor

Qodo and Cursor both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qodo (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Cursor (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 40). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qodo is slightly ahead of Cursor. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qodo is clearly ahead of Cursor. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cursor is ahead of Qodo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qodo is slightly ahead of Cursor. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cursor is slightly ahead of Qodo.

Qodo carries 4,512 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Cursor shows 44,397 stars across 8 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 41 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Cursor's footprint is roughly 9.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Qodo is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Cursor looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.