Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Contentsquare vs SolarWinds

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Contentsquare (Web optimization, testing & UX solutions) and SolarWinds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Contentsquare (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over SolarWinds (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 35). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SolarWinds is ahead of Contentsquare . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SolarWinds is slightly ahead of Contentsquare . On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SolarWinds is clearly ahead of Contentsquare . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SolarWinds is slightly ahead of Contentsquare .

Contentsquare carries 1,493 GitHub stars across 292 public repos, with 100 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. SolarWinds shows 1,101 stars across 104 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors.

Contentsquare is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. SolarWinds looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricContentsquare SolarWinds
Ranking
Overall rank#510#569
Pillars
Overall3735
Code4254
Education5050
Community3233
Reach934
Momentum5562
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,4931,101
Forks290471
Public repos292104
Active repos (90d)10035
External contributors1518
Avg polish4356
Avg AI-readiness3038

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Contentsquare developer profileView SolarWinds developer profile