Pioneering open-source coding agent
Continue vs Eli-Lilly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Continue (Pioneering open-source coding agent) and Eli-Lilly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Continue (rank #189) holds a meaningful lead over Eli-Lilly (rank #1095) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 10). The gap of 40 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Continue is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Continue is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Continue is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Eli-Lilly is slightly ahead of Continue. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Continue is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly.
Continue carries 34,981 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 136 external contributors on record. Eli-Lilly shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Continue is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Eli-Lilly looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Continue | Eli-Lilly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #189 | #1095 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 50 | 10 |
| Code | 51 | 0 |
| Education | 79 | 10 |
| Community | 41 | 0 |
| Reach | 40 | 44 |
| Momentum | 28 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 34,981 | 0 |
| Forks | 5,163 | 0 |
| Public repos | 8 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 0 |
| External contributors | 136 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 27 | 0 |