Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
Excalidraw is a whiteboard tool that lets you easily sketch diagrams that have a hand-drawn feel to them.
Countly Team vs Excalidraw
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and Excalidraw (Excalidraw is a whiteboard tool that lets you easily sketch diagrams that have a hand-drawn feel to them.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Excalidraw (rank #103) holds a modest lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 38). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Excalidraw is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Excalidraw is ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Excalidraw is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Excalidraw is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Countly Team is clearly ahead of Excalidraw.
Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Excalidraw shows 136,744 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 215 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Excalidraw's footprint is roughly 17.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Countly Team is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Excalidraw looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Countly Team | Excalidraw |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #103 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 55 |
| Code | 57 | 59 |
| Education | 56 | 68 |
| Community | 46 | 52 |
| Reach | 17 | 45 |
| Momentum | 61 | 6 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,804 | 136,744 |
| Forks | 2,002 | 15,937 |
| Public repos | 48 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 3 |
| External contributors | 13 | 215 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 56 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 37 |