Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
Countly Team vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Countly Team is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Countly Team is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Countly Team.
Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Countly Team is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Countly Team | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 40 |
| Code | 57 | 33 |
| Education | 56 | 68 |
| Community | 46 | 41 |
| Reach | 17 | 44 |
| Momentum | 61 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,804 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 2,002 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 48 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 20 |
| External contributors | 13 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 21 |