Countly Team vs draw.io

Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and draw.io (draw.io specialises in browser-based diagramming components and applications.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

draw.io (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Countly Team is ahead of draw.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), draw.io is ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), draw.io is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), draw.io is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Countly Team is clearly ahead of draw.io.

Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. draw.io shows 86,983 stars across 32 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but draw.io's footprint is roughly 11.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Countly Team is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. draw.io looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.