Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
Mattermost is a secure collaboration platform for connecting your teams, tools and processes to accelerate mission-critical work.
Countly Team vs Mattermost
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and Mattermost (Mattermost is a secure collaboration platform for connecting your teams, tools and processes to accelerate mission-critical work.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Mattermost (rank #38) holds a meaningful lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (62 vs 38). The gap of 24 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mattermost is ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mattermost is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Mattermost is ahead of Countly Team.
Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Mattermost shows 49,882 stars across 262 public repos, 58 active in the last 90 days and 105 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mattermost's footprint is roughly 6.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Countly Team is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Mattermost looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Countly Team | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #38 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 62 |
| Code | 57 | 78 |
| Education | 56 | 66 |
| Community | 46 | 47 |
| Reach | 17 | 79 |
| Momentum | 61 | 77 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,804 | 49,882 |
| Forks | 2,002 | 17,658 |
| Public repos | 48 | 262 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 58 |
| External contributors | 13 | 105 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 88 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 46 |