Countly Team vs Miro

Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Countly Team and Miro sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (38), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Countly Team is ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Countly Team is ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Countly Team is clearly ahead of Miro.

Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Countly Team's footprint is roughly 9.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Countly Team is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.