Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Countly Team vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 38). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Countly Team. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Countly Team is ahead of Teamwork.com. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Countly Team. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Countly Team is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Countly Team carries 7,804 GitHub stars across 48 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Countly Team's footprint is roughly 3.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Countly Team is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Countly Team | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #485 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 38 | 48 |
| Code | 57 | 58 |
| Education | 56 | 59 |
| Community | 46 | 37 |
| Reach | 17 | 47 |
| Momentum | 61 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7,804 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 2,002 | 384 |
| Public repos | 48 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 14 |
| External contributors | 13 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 61 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 38 |