World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Coursera vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Coursera and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Coursera (rank #726) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 30). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of Coursera. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Coursera. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is ahead of Coursera. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Coursera. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Coursera is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Coursera carries 1,367 GitHub stars across 81 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Coursera is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Coursera | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #726 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 48 |
| Code | 40 | 58 |
| Education | 37 | 59 |
| Community | 17 | 37 |
| Reach | 41 | 47 |
| Momentum | 30 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,367 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 596 | 384 |
| Public repos | 81 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 14 |
| External contributors | 0 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 25 | 38 |