Crisp helps every business deliver a great customer experience. The all-in-one platform for customer support.
Crisp vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Crisp (Crisp helps every business deliver a great customer experience. The all-in-one platform for customer support.) and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Crisp (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 40). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Crisp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Crisp is ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Crisp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Crisp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Crisp.
Crisp carries 506 GitHub stars across 27 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Crisp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Crisp | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 45 |
| Code | 49 | 76 |
| Education | 84 | 65 |
| Community | 26 | 39 |
| Reach | 4 | 37 |
| Momentum | 24 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 506 | 337 |
| Forks | 190 | 199 |
| Public repos | 27 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 33 |
| External contributors | 0 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 61 |