CrowdStrike vs Culture Amp

CrowdStrike and Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 31). The gap of 29 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), CrowdStrike is ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Culture Amp.

CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Culture Amp shows 1,202 stars across 179 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but CrowdStrike's footprint is roughly 5.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Culture Amp makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.