CrowdStrike vs HubSpot

CrowdStrike and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a narrow lead over HubSpot (rank #93) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 56). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is ahead of HubSpot. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of CrowdStrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of HubSpot.

CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 8.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.