CrowdStrike vs Mattermost

CrowdStrike and Mattermost (Mattermost is a secure collaboration platform for connecting your teams, tools and processes to accelerate mission-critical work.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Mattermost (rank #38) holds a narrow lead over CrowdStrike (rank #55) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (62 vs 60). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mattermost is ahead of CrowdStrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is ahead of Mattermost. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of Mattermost. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mattermost is clearly ahead of CrowdStrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of Mattermost.

CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Mattermost shows 49,882 stars across 262 public repos, 58 active in the last 90 days and 105 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mattermost's footprint is roughly 8.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Mattermost looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.