Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

CrowdStrike vs Razorpay

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

CrowdStrike and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #30) holds a narrow lead over CrowdStrike (rank #55) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 60). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is ahead of CrowdStrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is ahead of CrowdStrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is ahead of Razorpay.

CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors.

CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCrowdStrikeRazorpay
Ranking
Overall rank#55#30
Pillars
Overall6063
Code5968
Education7653
Community5344
Reach4058
Momentum8071
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars5,9913,811
Forks1,6361,932
Public repos267177
Active repos (90d)7438
External contributors2332
Avg polish7569
Avg AI-readiness2649

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View CrowdStrike developer profileView Razorpay developer profile