CrowdStrike vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
CrowdStrike and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a modest lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 42). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), CrowdStrike is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but CrowdStrike's footprint is roughly 3.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. RingCentral, Inc. makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CrowdStrike | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #55 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 60 | 42 |
| Code | 59 | 59 |
| Education | 76 | 52 |
| Community | 53 | 42 |
| Reach | 40 | 23 |
| Momentum | 80 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,991 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 1,636 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 267 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 74 | 31 |
| External contributors | 23 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 75 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 48 |