Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫
CrowdStrike vs Unsplash
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
CrowdStrike and Unsplash (Building the internet's open library of freely usable visuals. Join us 👫) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
CrowdStrike (rank #55) holds a modest lead over Unsplash (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 43). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of Unsplash. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), CrowdStrike is slightly ahead of Unsplash. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), CrowdStrike is ahead of Unsplash. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), CrowdStrike is clearly ahead of Unsplash.
CrowdStrike carries 5,991 GitHub stars across 267 public repos, with 74 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Unsplash shows 9,930 stars across 63 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
CrowdStrike is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Unsplash makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | CrowdStrike | Unsplash |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #55 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 60 | 43 |
| Code | 59 | 56 |
| Education | 76 | 72 |
| Community | 53 | 33 |
| Reach | 40 | 40 |
| Momentum | 80 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,991 | 9,930 |
| Forks | 1,636 | 829 |
| Public repos | 267 | 63 |
| Active repos (90d) | 74 | 3 |
| External contributors | 23 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 75 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 38 |