Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Cybersource

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Cybersource both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Cybersource (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Cybersource. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Cybersource shows 587 stars across 40 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Cybersource looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpCybersource
Ranking
Overall rank#693#536
Pillars
Overall3136
Code5349
Education4964
Community2431
Reach2036
Momentum3137
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202587
Forks123986
Public repos17940
Active repos (90d)1728
External contributors187
Avg polish5148
Avg AI-readiness3843

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Cybersource developer profile