Culture Amp vs Engineering at Fullstory

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Engineering at Fullstory (Fullstory APIs and Open-Source Projects) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Engineering at Fullstory (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Engineering at Fullstory is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Engineering at Fullstory is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is ahead of Engineering at Fullstory. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Engineering at Fullstory is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors on record. Engineering at Fullstory shows 19,463 stars across 64 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Engineering at Fullstory's footprint is roughly 16.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Engineering at Fullstory looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.