Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Gusto

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Gusto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Gusto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gusto is ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Gusto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gusto is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Gusto shows 781 stars across 148 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Gusto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpGusto
Ranking
Overall rank#693#338
Pillars
Overall3143
Code5360
Education4966
Community2435
Reach2019
Momentum3133
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202781
Forks123217
Public repos179148
Active repos (90d)1720
External contributors186
Avg polish5153
Avg AI-readiness3848

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Gusto developer profile