Culture Amp vs LinkedIn

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 64.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Culture Amp is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. LinkedIn looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.