Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Miro

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Miro (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 31). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is clearly ahead of Miro.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpMiro
Ranking
Overall rank#693#485
Pillars
Overall3138
Code5358
Education4986
Community2432
Reach200
Momentum318
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202843
Forks123380
Public repos17945
Active repos (90d)174
External contributors186
Avg polish5165
Avg AI-readiness3832

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Miro developer profile