Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Qonto

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 31). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is ahead of Qonto.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpQonto
Ranking
Overall rank#693#338
Pillars
Overall3143
Code5357
Education4975
Community2425
Reach2024
Momentum3121
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202501
Forks123158
Public repos17975
Active repos (90d)1711
External contributors185
Avg polish5162
Avg AI-readiness3836

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Qonto developer profile