Culture Amp vs Softr

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Softr (Softr Platforms GmbH) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Softr (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 31). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is clearly ahead of Softr. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Softr is ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Softr is ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Softr is ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Softr.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Softr shows 1 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Culture Amp's footprint is roughly 1202.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Softr looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.