The employee feedback platform
Culture Amp vs Sumo Logic, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Sumo Logic, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Sumo Logic, Inc. (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sumo Logic, Inc. is ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.
Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Sumo Logic, Inc. shows 1,842 stars across 107 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 14 external contributors.
Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sumo Logic, Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Culture Amp | Sumo Logic, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 41 |
| Code | 53 | 50 |
| Education | 49 | 47 |
| Community | 24 | 42 |
| Reach | 20 | 23 |
| Momentum | 31 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,202 | 1,842 |
| Forks | 123 | 1,655 |
| Public repos | 179 | 107 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 27 |
| External contributors | 18 | 14 |
| Avg polish | 51 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 39 |