Culture Amp vs Thomson Reuters

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Thomson Reuters (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is ahead of Thomson Reuters.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 438 stars across 144 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.