Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Typeform

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 31). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Culture Amp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Typeform is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Culture Amp.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Culture Amp is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpTypeform
Ranking
Overall rank#693#189
Pillars
Overall3150
Code5371
Education4951
Community2425
Reach2043
Momentum3131
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202590
Forks123254
Public repos17940
Active repos (90d)178
External contributors185
Avg polish5175
Avg AI-readiness3838

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Typeform developer profile