The employee feedback platform
Culture Amp vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Culture Amp is ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), UXPin is slightly ahead of Culture Amp.
Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Culture Amp | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 35 |
| Code | 53 | 30 |
| Education | 49 | 66 |
| Community | 24 | 13 |
| Reach | 20 | 39 |
| Momentum | 31 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,202 | 879 |
| Forks | 123 | 117 |
| Public repos | 179 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 3 |
| External contributors | 18 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 51 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 21 |