Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs The Washington Post

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

The Washington Post (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 31). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of The Washington Post. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is ahead of The Washington Post.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. The Washington Post looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpThe Washington Post
Ranking
Overall rank#693#510
Pillars
Overall3137
Code5350
Education4949
Community2418
Reach2050
Momentum3118
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,2022,751
Forks1231,061
Public repos17991
Active repos (90d)173
External contributors180
Avg polish5155
Avg AI-readiness3830

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView The Washington Post developer profile