Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Culture Amp vs Workable

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Workable (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 31). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Workable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Workable is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Workable.

Culture Amp carries 1,202 GitHub stars across 179 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Culture Amp is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Workable looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCulture AmpWorkable
Ranking
Overall rank#693#569
Pillars
Overall3135
Code5351
Education4956
Community2424
Reach2041
Momentum3130
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,202785
Forks123135
Public repos17996
Active repos (90d)175
External contributors185
Avg polish5146
Avg AI-readiness3849

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Culture Amp developer profileView Workable developer profile