Cursor vs sgl-project
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Cursor and sgl-project both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
sgl-project (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over Cursor (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 40). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), sgl-project is clearly ahead of Cursor. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sgl-project is clearly ahead of Cursor. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), sgl-project is clearly ahead of Cursor. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cursor is clearly ahead of sgl-project. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), sgl-project is slightly ahead of Cursor.
Cursor carries 44,397 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 41 external contributors on record. sgl-project shows 38,333 stars across 26 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 349 external contributors.
Cursor is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. sgl-project looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Cursor | sgl-project |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #278 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 46 |
| Code | 26 | 55 |
| Education | 46 | 74 |
| Community | 54 | 80 |
| Reach | 43 | 8 |
| Momentum | 34 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 44,397 | 38,333 |
| Forks | 3,777 | 8,904 |
| Public repos | 8 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 20 |
| External contributors | 41 | 349 |
| Avg polish | 31 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 47 |