Customer IO vs Doctolib

Customer IO and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Customer IO (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 33). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Customer IO is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Customer IO is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Customer IO carries 684 GitHub stars across 107 public repos, with 42 repositories active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Customer IO is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doctolib makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.