Customer IO vs Okta, Inc
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Customer IO and Okta, Inc both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Okta, Inc (rank #73) holds a narrow lead over Customer IO (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (58 vs 51). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Okta, Inc is ahead of Customer IO. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Okta, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Okta, Inc is slightly ahead of Customer IO. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Customer IO is ahead of Okta, Inc.
Customer IO carries 684 GitHub stars across 107 public repos, with 42 repositories active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors on record. Okta, Inc shows 6,250 stars across 88 public repos, 44 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Okta, Inc's footprint is roughly 9.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Customer IO is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Okta, Inc looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Customer IO | Okta, Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #73 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 58 |
| Code | 54 | 66 |
| Education | 80 | 77 |
| Community | 35 | 42 |
| Reach | 40 | 29 |
| Momentum | 45 | 45 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 684 | 6,250 |
| Forks | 346 | 5,038 |
| Public repos | 107 | 88 |
| Active repos (90d) | 42 | 44 |
| External contributors | 26 | 52 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 66 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 48 |