Customer IO vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Customer IO and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Customer IO (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 45). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Customer IO. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Customer IO is ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Customer IO. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Customer IO is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc..
Customer IO carries 684 GitHub stars across 107 public repos, with 42 repositories active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Customer IO is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Customer IO | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 45 |
| Code | 54 | 76 |
| Education | 80 | 65 |
| Community | 35 | 39 |
| Reach | 40 | 37 |
| Momentum | 45 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 684 | 337 |
| Forks | 346 | 199 |
| Public repos | 107 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 42 | 33 |
| External contributors | 26 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 61 |