Cvent vs Fillout

Cvent and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Cvent (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 37). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cvent is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cvent is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cvent is slightly ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Cvent. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cvent is ahead of Fillout.

Cvent carries 206 GitHub stars across 111 public repos, with 21 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Cvent's footprint is roughly 103.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Cvent is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.