Cybersource vs Getty Images
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Cybersource and Getty Images both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Cybersource (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cybersource is ahead of Getty Images. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cybersource is clearly ahead of Getty Images.
Cybersource carries 587 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Getty Images shows 951 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Cybersource is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Getty Images makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Cybersource | Getty Images |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 31 |
| Code | 49 | 46 |
| Education | 64 | 61 |
| Community | 31 | 20 |
| Reach | 36 | 28 |
| Momentum | 37 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 587 | 951 |
| Forks | 986 | 497 |
| Public repos | 40 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 5 |
| External contributors | 7 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 22 |