Cybersource vs Swiggy
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Cybersource and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Cybersource (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cybersource is ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Swiggy.
Cybersource carries 587 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Cybersource is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Swiggy makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Cybersource | Swiggy |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 32 |
| Code | 49 | 36 |
| Education | 64 | 55 |
| Community | 31 | 30 |
| Reach | 36 | 18 |
| Momentum | 37 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 587 | 314 |
| Forks | 986 | 93 |
| Public repos | 40 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 3 |
| External contributors | 7 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 37 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 32 |