Cybersource vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Cybersource and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Cybersource (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 36). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Cybersource. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is slightly ahead of Cybersource. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Typeform.
Cybersource carries 587 GitHub stars across 40 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Cybersource is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Cybersource | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 50 |
| Code | 49 | 71 |
| Education | 64 | 51 |
| Community | 31 | 25 |
| Reach | 36 | 43 |
| Momentum | 37 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 587 | 590 |
| Forks | 986 | 254 |
| Public repos | 40 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 8 |
| External contributors | 7 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 38 |