Simple and secure access to all your online accounts. At work, home, and everywhere in between.
Dashlane vs Klaviyo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dashlane (Simple and secure access to all your online accounts. At work, home, and everywhere in between.) and Klaviyo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Klaviyo (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Dashlane (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 36). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Dashlane. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Klaviyo is slightly ahead of Dashlane. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Klaviyo is ahead of Dashlane. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dashlane is slightly ahead of Klaviyo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Dashlane is slightly ahead of Klaviyo.
Dashlane carries 1,223 GitHub stars across 46 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Klaviyo shows 573 stars across 117 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Dashlane is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Klaviyo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dashlane | Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 48 |
| Code | 48 | 54 |
| Education | 53 | 56 |
| Community | 29 | 49 |
| Reach | 47 | 41 |
| Momentum | 38 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,223 | 573 |
| Forks | 253 | 339 |
| Public repos | 46 | 117 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 23 |
| External contributors | 3 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 42 |