DataCamp vs Discord

DataCamp and Discord (A new way to chat with your communities and friends. Discord is the easiest way to communicate over voice, video, and text.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Discord (rank #103) holds a modest lead over DataCamp (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 42). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Discord is ahead of DataCamp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Discord is ahead of DataCamp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Discord is clearly ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Discord is slightly ahead of DataCamp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Discord is clearly ahead of DataCamp.

DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Discord shows 28,570 stars across 327 public repos, 36 active in the last 90 days and 41 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Discord's footprint is roughly 4.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

DataCamp is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Discord looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.