DataCamp vs Fillout

DataCamp and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

DataCamp (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 37). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), DataCamp is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of DataCamp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is ahead of DataCamp.

DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but DataCamp's footprint is roughly 2919.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.