DataCamp vs Formbricks
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
DataCamp and Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formbricks (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over DataCamp (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 42). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is ahead of DataCamp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is clearly ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), DataCamp is slightly ahead of Formbricks. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formbricks is ahead of DataCamp.
DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Formbricks shows 12,675 stars across 18 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Formbricks looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DataCamp | Formbricks |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 48 |
| Code | 44 | 53 |
| Education | 67 | 67 |
| Community | 26 | 47 |
| Reach | 41 | 36 |
| Momentum | 6 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,838 | 12,675 |
| Forks | 3,688 | 2,459 |
| Public repos | 180 | 18 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 9 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 37 |