DataCamp vs jotform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
DataCamp and jotform (Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
DataCamp (rank #371) holds a modest lead over jotform (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 30). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), DataCamp is slightly ahead of jotform. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is clearly ahead of jotform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), DataCamp is slightly ahead of jotform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), jotform is clearly ahead of DataCamp.
DataCamp carries 5,840 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. jotform shows 1,105 stars across 32 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but DataCamp's footprint is roughly 5.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. jotform looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DataCamp | jotform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #371 | #727 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 30 |
| Code | 44 | 43 |
| Education | 67 | 43 |
| Community | 26 | 20 |
| Reach | 41 | 41 |
| Momentum | 4 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,840 | 1,105 |
| Forks | 3,687 | 412 |
| Public repos | 180 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 4 |
| External contributors | 0 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 29 |