DataCamp vs Metabase

DataCamp and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Metabase (rank #165) holds a modest lead over DataCamp (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 42). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Metabase is slightly ahead of DataCamp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is ahead of DataCamp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Metabase is ahead of DataCamp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is clearly ahead of DataCamp.

DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 8.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

DataCamp is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Metabase looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.