The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.
DataCamp vs Open edX
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
DataCamp and Open edX (The community-driven, open-source project powering edX.org and thousands of other online education sites around the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
DataCamp and Open edX sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (42), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open edX is clearly ahead of DataCamp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), DataCamp is clearly ahead of Open edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Open edX is clearly ahead of DataCamp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), DataCamp is clearly ahead of Open edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Open edX is clearly ahead of DataCamp.
DataCamp carries 5,838 GitHub stars across 180 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Open edX shows 10,654 stars across 186 public repos, 100 active in the last 90 days and 91 external contributors.
DataCamp is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Open edX looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | DataCamp | Open edX |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 42 |
| Code | 44 | 69 |
| Education | 67 | 42 |
| Community | 26 | 51 |
| Reach | 41 | 10 |
| Momentum | 6 | 67 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,838 | 10,654 |
| Forks | 3,688 | 8,888 |
| Public repos | 180 | 186 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 100 |
| External contributors | 0 | 91 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 39 |